Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2020
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Ruhr University Bochum Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Göttingen pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Medical Center Goettingen Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, Department of Anesthesiology — Ruhr University Bochum et University of Göttingen, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.