SP320OXIDATIVE/NITRATIVE STRESS AND INFLAMMATION DRIVE PROGRESSION OF DOXORUBICIN-INDUCED RENAL FIBROSIS IN RATS AS REVEALED BY COMPARING A NORMAL AND A FIBROSIS-RESISTANT RAT STRAIN
Rattachement africain : hu, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction and Aims: Genetic background has a strong influence on the progression of chronic kidney disease. We recently found that Rowett black hooded rats were resistant to renal fibrosis. We aimed to investigate the role of sustained inflammation and oxidative/nitrative damage in renal fibrosis progression using this new model. Our previous data suggested the involvement of podocytes, thus we investigated renal fibrosis initiated by doxorubicin-induced podocyte damage. Methods: Rats were treated with Doxorubicin (5 mg/kg) and observed for 8-weeks. Survival was assessed in a separate cohort. Renal function was assessed as urinary protein and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin excretion and histologic analysis following periodic acid-Schiff and Picro-Sirius-red staining and nephrin and fibronectin immunohistochemistry and profibrotic factors (TGF-β1, CTGF, collagen type I alpha 1), and inflammatory (MCP1) mRNA expression were detected by PCR. Oxidative and nitrative stress was evaluated by p47phox (neutrophil cytosol factor 1) p91-phox (NADPH oxidase-2) expression on western blot and 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) and nitrotyrosine (NT) staining.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- SP320OXIDATIVE/NITRATIVE STRESS AND INFLAMMATION DRIVE PROGRESSION OF DOXORUBICIN-INDUCED RENAL FIBROSIS IN RATS AS REVEALED BY COMPARING A NORMAL AND A FIBROSIS-RESISTANT RAT STRAIN
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2015
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.