Coagulation abnormalities, bleeding, thrombosis, and management of patients with acute liver failure in Australia and New Zealand

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background and Aim To study the management of coagulation and hematological derangements among severe acute liver failure (ALF) patients in Australia and New Zealand liver transplant intensive care units (ICUs). Methods Analysis of key baseline characteristics, etiology, coagulation and hematological tests, use of blood products, thrombotic complications, and clinical outcomes during the first ICU week. Results We studied 62 ALF patients. The first day median peak international normalized ratio was 5.5 (inter‐quartile range [IQR] 3.8–8.7), median longest activated partial thromboplastin time was 62 s (IQR 44–87), and median lowest fibrinogen was 1.1 (IQR 0.8–1.6) g/L. Fibrinogen was only measured in 85% of patients, which was less than other tests ( P < 0.0001). Median initial lowest platelet count was 83 (IQR 41–122) × 10 9 /L. Overall, 58% of patients received fresh frozen plasma, 40% cryoprecipitate, 35% platelets, and 15% prothrombin complex concentrate. Patients with bleeding complications (19%) had more severe overall hypofibrinogenemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombotic complications were less common (10% of patients), were not associated with consistent patterns of abnormal hemostasis, and were not immediately preceded by clotting factor administration and half occurred only after liver transplantation surgery. Conclusion In ALF patients admitted to dedicated Australia and New Zealand ICUs, fibrinogen was measured less frequently than other coagulation parameters but, together with platelets, appeared more relevant to bleeding risk. Blood products and procoagulant factors were administered to most patients at variable levels of hemostatic derangement, and bleeding complications were more common than thrombotic complications. This epidemiologic information and practice variability provide baseline data for the design and powering of interventional studies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.