Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2019 article

Accuracy of P0.1 measurements performed by ICU ventilators: a bench study

63Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P0.1), defined as the negative pressure measured 100 ms after the initiation of an inspiratory effort performed against a closed respiratory circuit, has been shown to be well correlated with central respiratory drive and respiratory effort. Automated P0.1 measurement is available on modern ventilators. However, the reliability of this measurement has never been studied. This bench study aimed at assessing the accuracy of P0.1 measurements automatically performed by different ICU ventilators. Five ventilators set in pressure support mode were tested using a two-chamber test lung model simulating spontaneous breathing. P0.1 automatically displayed on the ventilator screen (P0.1 vent ) was recorded at three levels of simulated inspiratory effort corresponding to P0.1 of 2.5, 5 and 10 cm H 2 O measured directly at the test lung and considered as the reference values of P0.1 (P0.1 ref ). The pressure drop after 100 ms was measured offline on the airway pressure–time curves recorded during the automated P0.1 measurements (P0.1 aw ). P0.1 vent was compared to P0.1 ref and to P0.1 aw . To assess the potential impact of the circuit length, P0.1 were also measured with circuits of different lengths (P0.1 circuit ). Variations of P0.1 vent correlated well with variations of P0.1 ref . Overall, P0.1 vent underestimated P0.1 ref except for the Löwenstein ® ventilator at P0.1 ref 2.5 cm H 2 O and for the Getinge group ® ventilator at P0.1 ref 10 cm H 2 O. The agreement between P0.1 vent and P0.1 ref assessed with the Bland–Altman method gave a mean bias of − 1.3 cm H 2 O (limits of agreement: 1 and − 3.7 cm H 2 O). Analysis of airway pressure–time and flow–time curves showed that all the tested ventilators except the Getinge group ® ventilator performed an occlusion of at least 100 ms to measure P0.1. The agreement between P0.1 vent and P0.1 aw assessed with the Bland–Altman method gave a mean bias of 0.5 cm H 2 O (limits of agreement: 2.4 and − 1.4 cm H 2 O). The circuit’s length impacted P0.1 measurements’ values. A longer circuit was associated with lower P0.1 circuit values. P0.1 vent relative changes are well correlated to P0.1 ref changes in all the tested ventilators. Accuracy of absolute values of P0.1 vent varies according to the ventilator model. Overall, P0.1 vent underestimates P0.1 ref . The length of the circuit may partially explain P0.1 vent underestimation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Accuracy of P0.1 measurements performed by ICU ventilators: a bench study
Date Crossref
01/01/2019
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Respiratory Support and MechanismsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.