Real‐world treatment patterns and outcomes in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
Rattachement africain : cn, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIM: To investigate treatment patterns and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients beyond second progression (PD2) since regorafenib and TAS-102 became available in Hong Kong. METHODS: The clinical records of consecutive mCRC patients who were treated beyond PD2 at Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital between June 2013 and February 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 176 PD2 patients (76.7% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 and a median follow-up time of 6.6 [range, 0.4-37.2] months), 104 (59%) underwent palliative care only and 72 (41%) received active third-line (3L) treatment: regorafenib (n = 22), TAS-102 (n = 6), chemotherapy + antiepidermal growth factor receptor (n = 12), chemotherapy + antivascular endothelial growth factor (n = 28) or clinical trials (n = 4). Patients on active 3L treatment had significantly longer OS than those on palliative care only: 11.7 versus 5.5 months (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.61, P < 0.001). For those on active treatment, OS was significantly associated with the time from diagnosis of metastasis to PD2 (P < 0.001) and post-3L treatments (P = 0.009). When analyzing treatment eligibility according to trial criteria, half of the eligible patients (54/109) did not receive active treatment, but both eligible and ineligible patients achieved better OS when receiving active 3L treatment versus palliative care only (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). No unexpected toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Active 3L and beyond treatment significantly prolonged OS versus palliative care, even in selected "trial ineligible" patients. Given a high rate of palliation only care in eligible patients, improved patient access to medicine and counseling may be needed to maximize outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Real‐world treatment patterns and outcomes in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2019
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Queen Mary Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital Clinical Oncology Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Hong Kong pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Tuen Mun Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine Department of Clinical Oncology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Clinical Oncology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Queen Mary Hospital, Clinical Oncology Center — University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital et University of Hong Kong, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.