Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2018 article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study

19Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background. Diaper rash, also known as diaper dermatitis (DD), is a very common skin condition in infants, and use of disposable diapers with breathable materials is an effective approach for the management of diaper rash. In China, new material diapers and standard diapers are currently the two most commonly used disposable diapers. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of new material diapers versus standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies. Methods. A total of 80 eligible babies admitted to Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital during the period from June through July, 2016, were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Babies in Group A ( n=41 ) used the new material diapers, and babies in Group B ( n=39 ) used standard diapers. Two weeks after the use of the diaper, the babies used the alternate product for the next 2 weeks. Skin conditions were assessed on the front and back waist, right and left buttock, pubic region, anal region, and right and left groin using a 6-point scoring system based on four parameters in 0, 2, and 4 weeks after use of the diapers. Results. There were changes of the mean skin assessment score in each of the six regions after the use of the diapers. There were significant differences, in the mean skin assessment score of the front waist in Group A between weeks 2 and 4 ( P=0.006 ) and in Group B between weeks 0 and 2 ( P=0.004 ), and no significant differences were detected in the mean skin assessment score of the back waist and buttock in both Group A and Group B on weeks 0, 2, and 4. A higher mean skin assessment score of the pubic region was assessed in Group A on week 4 than on week 2 ( P=0.036 ), with a higher score seen on week 2 than on week 0 ( P=0.048 ), while no significant differences were found in Group B among weeks 0, 2, or 4. There was a higher mean score of the anal region assessed in Group A on week 2 than on week 0 ( P=0.01 ), while a higher mean score was found in Group B on week 2 than on weeks 0 ( P=0.036 ) and 4 ( P=0.01 ). In addition, a higher mean skin assessment score of the groin was detected on week 2 than on week 0 in both Group A ( P=0.00001 ) and Group B ( P=0.0001 ). Conclusion. The new material diaper is superior to the standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
Date Crossref
24/06/2018
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Kao Corporation (Japan) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Sanitary Products Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Ltd. Kao (China) Research and Development Center Co. pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Kao Corporation (Japan) et Sanitary Products Research, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Neonatal skin health careBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesOral and Craniofacial Lesions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.