Aller au contenu principal
2015 conference-abstract

Lymph node ratio (LNR) in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) era: Are we losing prognostic information?

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

e12634 Background: The number of involved axillary lymph nodes (LNs) found on pathological assessment is regarded as a significant prognostic factor for patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Recent reports have suggested that LNR may be a better surrogate at predicting cancer-specific outcome than the number of involved LN. This retrospective study investigated the prognostic value of LNR, using earlier published cut-off values, before the introduction of SLNB. Methods: A population-based study was performed, using data from UHL Oncology Database, including all women diagnosed with node-positive EBC between 01/01/2001 and 31/12/2010 (N = 553). Records were retrospectively evaluated for clinical, demographic and pathologic data. Majority had axillary node clearance (ANC) (548/553; 99.1%). Patients were divided into 3 LNR risk groups (Low: ≤ 0.20; Intermediate: 0.21 – 0.65; and High: > 0.65). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Proportional hazard modelling was undertaken to evaluate whether LNR was associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Median follow-up: 59.8 months (IQR: 37.1 – 88.9). LNR distribution: Low: 303/553 (54.8%), Intermediate: 160/553 (28.9%) and, High: 90/553 (16.3%). Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS stratified by LNR risk group, showed Low risk group had better outcome for OS (p < 0.001). 5- and 10-year OS survival rates were 63% and 58%, respectively. The number of positive LNs correlated with 10-year OS (66%, 48% and, 48% for patients with N1, N2 and N3 stage respectively; p < 0.001). LNR also correlated with 5-year OS (69%, 48% and, 41% for Low-, Intermediate-, and High-risk groups respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly, LNR on multivariate analysis also formed a prognostic model when combined with age, ER status, PgR status and, HER2 status (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings support the use LNR as a predictor for OS for patients with EBC in Mid-Western Ireland. LNR should be considered as an independent prognostic variable to the current prognostic instruments already in use. In a SLNB and Z0011 era, are we losing potential prognostic information?

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Lymph node ratio (LNR) in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) era: Are we losing prognostic information?
Date Crossref
20/05/2015
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.