Efficacy of milk versus water to reduce interfering infra-cardiac activity in 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
Rattachement africain : us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Interference from infra-cardiac radionuclide activity prevents accurate interpretation of true myocardial perfusion. The study aim was to compare the efficacy of milk versus water in reducing infra-cardiac activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 198 patients undergoing stress-rest (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT with exercise or pharmacological stress to drink 300 ml of water or milk prior to imaging. A semi-quantitative grading of the relative intensity of infra-cardiac activity compared to the myocardial activity and a qualitative assessment of the effect on the overall interpretation was performed. RESULTS: For stress images, there was no infra-cardiac activity in 37.9%, less intense infra-cardiac activity in 40.8%, equal in 11.7% and greater than infra-cardiac activity in 9.7% with milk, compared with 20.0%, 49.5%, 20.0% and 10.5%, respectively, with water (P=0.038). For rest images, there was also less intense infra-cardiac activity with milk compared to water (P=0.014). However, no change in subsequent image interpretation was seen. CONCLUSION: Administration of milk resulted in a significant decrease in the intensity of infra-cardiac activity compared to water. However, this did not translate into an improvement in image interpretation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy of milk versus water to reduce interfering infra-cardiac activity in 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2006
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.