Pre-Mammillary Endoscopy: Evaluation with Phase Contrast Cine-MR Imaging
Rattachement africain : it, es, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) waveform evaluation through the use of Phase Contrast Cine-Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging after pre-mammillary endoscopic ventriculostomy. A descriptive study of 21 patients, 13 men and 8 women (average age 36), submitted to pre-mammillary endoscopic ventriculostomy for treatment of non-communicating hydrocephalus. Evaluation of CSF was accomplished using a Siemens System (1.5 Siemens Magnetom 63SP) with continuous data recording and retrospective cardiac gating. The quantitative study was performed with in-plane and through-plane spatial resolution: sagittal and transverse 2D FISP (70,100 TR/13,16 TE, flip angle 15°), recording the mean velocity at the level of aqueduct, pontine cistern and CSF space in front of C1 as well as mean and maximum velocities and stroke volume at the ventriculostomy site. A Pearson correlation (P<0.001) is present between diastolic and systolic stroke volumes not only at the site the ventriculostomy but also among stroke volumes and velocities in the pontine cistern and aqueduct. The only level where no statistical correlation was found between stroke volumes and velocities was the CSF space before the first cervical vertebral body (C1). Analysis with Phase Contrast Cine-MR imaging shows that pre-mammillary endoscopic ventriculostomy is efficient for restoring cerebrospinal fluid pulsatile waveform.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pre-Mammillary Endoscopy: Evaluation with Phase Contrast Cine-MR Imaging
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/1999
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.