Abstract 2319: Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF via a novel human bispecific bivalent IgG1 CrossMAb shows potent anti-angiogenic, antitumoral, and antimetastatic efficacy and leads to a reduced side effect profile compared to single therapies
Rattachement africain : de, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract VEGF-A blockade has been extensively clinically validated as a treatment for human cancers. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) expression has been shown to function as a key regulator of blood vessel remodeling, tumor angiogenesis, and metastasis. In tumors, Ang-2 is up-regulated and associated with poor prognosis. Recent data demonstrated that Ang-2 inhibitors, both as single agents or in combination with chemo- or anti-VEGF therapy, mediate anti-tumor effects. Additionally, it has been shown that the Ang-2/-1/Tie and the VEGF/VEGFR systems act in complementary ways suggesting that dual targeting may be more effective than targeting each pathway alone. Based on bevacizumab and the Ang-2 selective antibody LC06 we have generated a novel human bispecific bivalent IgG1 CrossMab antibody blocking VEGF-A and Ang-2 function simultaneously. Here we show in multiple subcutaneous and orthotopic in vivo models including models (semi-) resistant to anti-VEGF treatment that the systemic application of the Ang-2-VEGF CrossMAb effectively reduces angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a highly selective anti-Ang-2 approach has safety related advantages in this model over an unselective treatment with an antibody targeting Ang-1 and Ang-2 simultaneously. Whereas anti-Ang-1/Ang-2 long-term treatment resulted in regression of healthy vessels in the mouse trachea, an anti-Ang-2 selective treatment did not affect the physiological vessels in the trachea of the mice at all. These results imply a clear differentiation between selective Ang-2 and unselective Ang-1/Ang-2 inhibition. Although anti-tumoral efficacy is retained selective Ang-2 inhibition did not lead to a further impairment of healthy vessels compared to anti-VEGF-A treatment only. Finally, we demonstrate a clear disadvantage of Ang-2 monotherapy compared to Ang-2-VEGF dual inhibition due to strong up-regulation of VEGF resulting not only in revascularization and tumor growth, but also in toxicity with macroscopic evidence of histopathological subcapsular peliosis-like changes in the liver. These pathological effects were inhibited by dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF-A. Taken together, our data indicate that Ang-2 and VEGF-A exhibit angiogenic synergy in a mutually compensatory fashion and that their inhibition via the novel Ang-2-VEGF CrossMab mediates potent anti-tumoral, anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic efficacy. Additionally the CrossMAb is expected to exhibtit a better side effect profile compared to the respective monotherapies and thereby represents a promising therapeutic agent for the therapy of cancer. These data support the investigation of the Ang-2-VEGF CrossMAb in PhI clinical trials scheduled for 2012. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2319. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2319
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract 2319: Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF via a novel human bispecific bivalent IgG1 CrossMAb shows potent anti-angiogenic, antitumoral, and antimetastatic efficacy and leads to a reduced side effect profile compared to single therapies
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2012
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.