Court‐appointed psychologists and the retained trial advocate in child custody cases provide a framework for family court judges evaluating competing expert testimony
Michael W. Gombatz, Syretta R. James
Abstract Family court judges in contested custody matters increasingly face competing testimony from two structurally different categories of mental health experts. The first is a court‐appointed neutral evaluator selected through a vetting process. The second is a mental health professional retained and …
us (code pays fourni par la source)
0 citations
Juvenile and Family Court Journal