Sara Schroter

Code Sharing Checklist Development

Nicholas J DeVito, Florian Naudet, A. Gougeon, Sara Schroter

Repository for a UKRI/Coefficient Giving funded project on improving code sharing in research.

gb (code pays fourni par la source)

Exploring views on remuneration for review: a survey of patient and public reviewers for The BMJ

Sara Schroter, Rebecca Harmston, Emma Doble, Sophie Cook et autres

OBJECTIVES: invites patients and the public (P&P) to review manuscripts alongside academic reviewers and recently introduced remuneration. We surveyed P&P reviewers to capture perspectives on remuneration and overall reviewing experience. DESIGN/SETTING: journal. PARTICIPANTS: and views from those less familiar, we conducted two …

gb, us (code pays fourni par la source)

ATHENA 2 : Protocol for a retrospective cohort study of editorial decisions on manuscripts by author gender and geographic and economic context in biomedical journals.

Ronny Makhoul, Sara Schroter, Orestis Efthimiou, Mark Richards et autres

This protocol describes a retrospective cohort study examining whether author gender and manuscript geographic/economic context are associated with editorial decisions, specifically acceptance for publication and selection for peer review, across 24 BMJ Publishing Group journals for manuscripts submitted between 2012 and 2023.

Taking the guesswork out of clinical trial registration information

David Blanco, Elizabeth Loder, Sara Schroter

Full and clear information about prospective or retrospective registration must be provided in submitted and published clinical trials, write David Blanco, Elizabeth Loder, and Sara Schroter

es, us, gb (code pays fourni par la source)

Analysis of non-prospective trial registration in clinical trials submitted to The BMJ : observational study

David Blanco, Elizabeth Loder, Sophie Cook, Martí Casals et autres

Abstract Objectives To identify variables associated with non-prospective registration of clinical trials submitted to The BMJ ; examine deficiencies in registration, disclosure of deficiencies, and subsequent publication status of such trials; and assess the authors’ claims of prospective registration. Design Observational study. …

es, us, gb (code pays fourni par la source)

Self-Disclosed Use of AI in Research Submissions to BMJ Journals

Isamme AlFayyad, Maurice P. Zeegers, L.M. Bouter, Helen Macdonald et autres

This study examines self-disclosed use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research manuscripts submitted to BMJ Group journals, including the types of tools used and frequency of use.

sa, nl, gb (code pays fourni par la source)

ATHENA 2 : Protocol for a retrospective cohort study of editorial decisions on manuscripts by author gender and geographic and economic context in biomedical journals.

Maël Barthoulot, Orestis Efthimiou, Ronny Makhoul, Mark Richards et autres

This protocol describes a retrospective cohort study examining whether author gender and manuscript geographic/economic context are associated with editorial decisions, specifically acceptance for publication and selection for peer review, across 24 BMJ Publishing Group journals for manuscripts submitted between 2012 and 2023.

Perspectives of librarians and information specialists on conducting methodological peer reviews of systematic reviews: a mixed-methods study

Melissa Lyle Rethlefsen, Carrie L Price, Sara Schroter

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives of librarians and information specialists (LIS) on their experience and impact as peer reviewers of systematic reviews (SRs), and on facilitators and barriers to LIS methodological peer review. DESIGN: Survey and focus groups. SETTING: from 3 January …

us (code pays fourni par la source)

Authors self-disclosed use of artificial intelligence in research submissions to 49 biomedical journals: A cross-sectional study

Isamme AlFayyad, Zeegers P Maurice, L.M. Bouter, Helen Macdonald et autres

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the frequency of self-disclosed use of AI in research manuscripts submitted to 49 biomedical journals and to identify types of AI tools used, the tasks they assisted with, and factors associated with disclosure. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING 49 …

nl, sa, tw (code pays fourni par la source)

Exploring views on remuneration for review: A survey of patient and public reviewers

Sara Schroter, Becky Harmston, Emma Doble, Sophie Cook et autres

ObjectivesCalls to compensate patient partners for contributions to the health sector are increasing. The BMJ invites patients and the public (P&P) to review manuscripts alongside academic reviewers and recently introduced remuneration. We surveyed P&P reviewers to capture perspectives on remuneration and overall …

gb (code pays fourni par la source)

Perspectives of Librarians and Information Specialists on Conducting Methodological Peer Reviews of Systematic Reviews: A Mixed-Methods Study

Melissa Lyle Rethlefsen, Carrie L Price, Sara Schroter

Objectives: To explore the perspectives of librarians and information specialists (LIS) who participated in a randomized controlled trial of the effect of LIS involvement on reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs).Design: Survey and focus groupsSetting: We surveyed LIS who completed a peer …

us (code pays fourni par la source)

Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials

Hillary Wnfried Ramirez, Malena Chiaborelli, Christof M Schönenberger, Katie Mellor et autres

OBJECTIVES: Two studies randomizing manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals have previously shown that reminding peer reviewers about key reporting items did not improve the reporting quality in published articles. Within this secondary analysis of peer reviewer reports we aimed to assess at …

ch, gb, ca, hu, fr (code pays fourni par la source)