Aller au contenu principal
2008 article

Using quality improvement methods to improve door-to-balloon time at an academic medical center.

36Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: 1) Describe a quality improvement (QI) process to decrease door-to-balloon time (D2B); 2) Explain implementation of evidence-based strategies to improve D2B. BACKGROUND: The ACC/AHA 2006 guideline target for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a D2B of 90 minutes (min). QI methods can be used to identify areas for improvement, measure current processes, and provide rapid-cycle feedback about which strategies are effective. METHODS: We studied all STEMI patients presenting to Vanderbilt University Medical Center from July 2005 through November 2006. A process flow chart was created and all D2B process steps were analyzed. In February 2006, evidence-based strategies were implemented to address bottlenecks and decrease D2B. Statistical process control (SPC) was used to monitor D2B time in real-time. RESULTS: Targeted changes led to a 44 min decrease (p < 0.001) in overall median D2B time from 108 min (interquartile range [IQR] = 94-122 min) to 64 min (IQR = 56-94 min). Subinterval time periods for emergency department (ED)-to-electrocardiogram (ECG) time decreased by 7 min (p = 0.008), ECG-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) time decreased by 18 min (p = 0.01), and CCL-to-balloon time decreased by 4 min (p = 0.19). After implementation, SPC charts revealed a 50% decrease in the central mean line and narrower control limits indicating more reliable performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using QI methods of flow-charting, identifying bottlenecks, targeting strategies to bottleneck areas, and real-time monitoring with SPC and rapid-cycle feedback, D2B processes can be systematically redesigned for improvement. QI methods can be used by individual institutions to customize and implement strategies for their particular context.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Advanced Statistical Process MonitoringClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.