Aller au contenu principal
1996 article

Pretransplant panel reactive-antibody screens. Are they truly a marker for poor outcome after cardiac transplantation?

113Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The effect of pretransplant sensitization on outcome after cardiac transplant has been controversial. Sensitization, defined as a positive panel-reactive antibody (PRA) screen in patients awaiting transplant, represents circulating antibodies to a random panel of donor lymphocytes (usually T lymphocytes). The significance of pretransplant circulating antibodies to B lymphocytes has not been reported, and many centers disregard its use. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the pretransplant PRA screens for 311 patients who underwent cardiac transplant at our institution. The PRA screen was performed by use of the lymphocytotoxic technique treated with dithiothreitol to remove IgM autoantibodies. Patients with PRA > or = 11% against T or B lymphocytes had significantly lower 3-year survival (T lymphocytes, 39%; B lymphocytes, 56%) than those patients with PRA = 0% and PRA = 1% to 10% (T lymphocytes, 76% and 78%; B lymphocytes, 78% and 74%, respectively) (P < .001). For this high-risk group, the rejection episode tended to occur earlier than in those patients with PRA = 0% and PRA = 1% to 10% (T lymphocytes, 2.3 versus 4.0 and 3.8 months; B lymphocytes, 2.1 versus 4.1 and 3.4 months, respectively), and there were more clinically severe rejections that required OKT3 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac transplant patients with pretransplant T- and/or B-lymphocyte PRA > or = 11% despite negative donor-specific crossmatch at the time of transplant appear to have earlier and more severe rejection with significantly lower survival after transplant surgery. Modification of immunosuppression in these high-risk patients may be warranted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of California Division of Cardiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Division of Cardiology — University of California.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Transplantation: Methods and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsT-cell and B-cell Immunology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.