A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for ICH Prognostication: An Analysis of ATACH-2 and Qatar Stroke Database
Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Multiple prognostic scores have been developed to predict morbidity and mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). These scoring models were traditionally based on statistical methods involving a limited set of variables. The advent of machine learning (ML) has enabled the development of several prognostic models for sICH that can leverage much more data. METHODS: We trained ML models on two distinct datasets: (1) Qatar dataset only and (2) a combined dataset consisting of the Qatar and Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-2) datasets. Model validation was conducted separately on the Qatar and ATACH test sets, providing insights into model performance within and across study populations. By incorporating inpatient variables into model development, we leveraged more information. We also compared models derived from admission-only variables with models derived from both admission and inpatient variables. RESULTS: For 90-day mortality using combined training data, XGBoost (XGB) achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) on the Qatar test set, while Random Forest achieved an AUC of 0.916 on the ATACH test set. For 90-day functional outcomes, Random Forest and XGB achieved AUCs of 0.882, respectively. Models trained using both admission and inpatient data outperformed admission-only models. Feature importance revealed important markers of prognostication such as hematoma expansion and status of intubation. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that results were robust to assumptions regarding follow-up imaging availability. CONCLUSION: Our study design mirrors a real-world deployment scenario in which a model developed at a single center is transported to external cohorts, while still preventing any information leakage from test data.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for ICH Prognostication: An Analysis of ATACH-2 and Qatar Stroke Database
- Date Crossref
- 22/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Toledo pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Oklahoma State Department of Health pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Manitoba pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Missouri pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Alberta pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Kohl’s Technology pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Michigan State University Office of Health Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University of Toledo, Oklahoma State Department of Health et University of Manitoba, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.