Undercatch corrected gridded precipitation data to improve hydrological modeling in high-alpine orography

Le résumé fourni par la source

Stationary precipitation measurements are frequently affected by undercatch errors, which are particularly pronounced in cold and alpine regions with strong winds. Since gridded precipitation products used in land surface modeling are often derived from spatial interpolation of meteorological station data, these measurement errors propagate directly into gridded datasets. In this study, we train monthly Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) using undercatch corrected station observations, with geographical exposure and terrain elevation as predictors, achieving R 2 values above 0.76 in Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation. We apply these models to generate monthly undercatch correction factors for Austria and – combined with an exposed terrain penalty – use them to adjust existing station-based gridded precipitation products. We validate the undercatch correction using the conceptual rainfall-runoff model COSERO across Austria and in two high-alpine reservoir catchments: Kölnbrein and Schlegeis. Our results demonstrate that retrospectively corrected precipitation reduces runoff simulation biases across Austria, especially in catchments above 1500 m elevation, and closes the water balance in both alpine study regions where uncorrected data showed runoff deficits exceeding 20 %. Biases in snow depth simulations – assessed using the physically-based snowpack model Alpine3D and validated against stereo-satellite observations – decrease from a median difference of −0.87 to +0.15 m. Additionally, undercatch-corrected precipitation enables more realistic simulations of snow covered area during the melting season and long-term glacier volume changes. The proposed method shows promising results in both alpine case study catchments and across Austria, highlighting the importance of accounting for undercatch errors in high-alpine terrain and indicating the need for further research into their magnitude at high elevations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.