QiMeng-EvoPartition: Rethinking the Impact of Partitioning for Automated Pipeline Design
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
As a key technique for improving throughput by increasing clock frequency and reducing Cycles per Instruction (CPI), pipeline design increasingly relies on automated methods with the growing scale of modern circuits. However, existing automated pipelining methods often decouple partitioning from CPI optimization, implicitly assuming that partitioning affects only clock frequency. We observe that different partitioning strategies significantly alter the pipeline stage differences between logic gates, thereby impacting the average number of stall cycles and ultimately affecting CPI. Thus, automated pipeline partitioning should jointly reduce CPI and improve clock frequency while ensuring functional correctness, resulting in a multi-objective optimization problem. To address this issue, we propose EvoPartition, an evolutionary partitioning framework for automated pipeline design. Specifically, EvoPartition first inserts virtual nodes to guarantee functional correctness. Then, through iterative evolution for reducing CPI and improving clock frequency, pipeline stage assignments of all nodes are determined. Experimental results on ISCAS85 and EPFL show that EvoPartition achieves a 7.34% CPI optimization by reducing stage differences by 16.23%, and further improves throughput by 7.22% compared to the state-of-the-art.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- QiMeng-EvoPartition: Rethinking the Impact of Partitioning for Automated Pipeline Design
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.