Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Patterns of use of mental health crisis-related services in the English NHS: retrospective observational study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Improving access to community-based crisis care and reducing in-patient admissions are key policy objectives in England, yet evidence on who uses crisis-related services remains limited. AIMS: To examine sociodemographic patterns in the use of six crisis-related services in England: crisis phonelines; crisis cafés; Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment teams (CRHTs); voluntary in-patient admissions; compulsory in-patient admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA); and conveyance to a Place of Safety (PoS) by police under section 136 of the MHA. METHOD: This retrospective observational study used the Mental Health Services Data Set (2021/2022-2023/2024). Adults (18+ years) using any of the six services were included. A multinomial logit regression model estimated average marginal effects for age, gender, ethnicity and area-level deprivation, with robust patient-level standard errors and year fixed effects. RESULTS: Among crisis-related patients, adjusted analysis showed that several ethnic minority groups were more likely than White individuals to be compulsorily detained or brought to a PoS, and less likely to use CRHTs, with the largest disparities in compulsory admissions for Black (+15.0 percentage points) and Asian (+7.3 percentage points) groups. Compulsory admissions were more common among older adults and men (+1.5 percentage points). Crisis phonelines were used less by older adults, men (-4.8 percentage points), Black (-15.6 percentage points) and Asian (-4.7 percentage points) groups. Although adjusted differences by deprivation were small (<1.0 percentage points), over half of users lived in the 2 most deprived quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Groups at greater risk of coercive care were less likely to access community crisis services. Addressing these disparities could reduce inequalities.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Patterns of use of mental health crisis-related services in the English NHS: retrospective observational study
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.