Comparison of Individual Tree Segmentation Algorithms and DBH Retrieval for Pinus massoniana Based on Multi-Source LiDAR Data

Le résumé fourni par la source

Individual tree segmentation and diameter at breast height (DBH) estimation are fundamental to precision forest inventory. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology has become an essential tool for achieving these objectives at the single-tree level. Different LiDAR platforms—notably unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS)—each offer distinct advantages in capturing forest structural information. Multi-source LiDAR fusion has been proposed as a strategy to combine these complementary strengths. However, how to effectively select segmentation algorithms across different LiDAR data sources remains insufficiently understood, particularly for subtropical coniferous plantations with heterogeneous canopy structure. This study systematically compared four individual tree segmentation algorithms (Donager2021, Dalponte2016, Silva2016, and marker-controlled watershed segmentation [MCWS]) across three LiDAR data sources (UAV-only, MLS-only, and fused UAV–MLS) in Pinus massoniana plantations in subtropical China. DBH estimation models were then developed based on the best-performing segmentation results to examine whether data fusion simultaneously improves both detection and DBH retrieval accuracy. The main findings are as follows: (1) the three canopy height model (CHM)-based algorithms achieved a mean overall accuracy (OA) for individual-tree detection of approximately 64% on UAV data but fell below 30% on MLS data, failing to support effective detection; (2) The Donager2021 algorithm, which directly exploits trunk structure from three-dimensional point clouds, achieved the highest OA of 93.15% with MLS data and further improved to 94.82% with fused data; (3) DBH estimation reached a mean R2 of 0.96 for both MLS and fused datasets, yet MLS LiDAR alone produced a lower RMSE (2.31 cm; rRMSE = 5.91%) than fused LiDAR (RMSE = 2.40 cm; rRMSE = 6.24%); and (4) higher detection accuracy did not necessarily lead to better DBH estimation, revealing a trade-off between the two objectives. These findings indicate that fusion does not universally improve all downstream tasks, and that the choice of LiDAR configuration and segmentation algorithm should be guided by specific inventory objectives.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.