Lumbar Decompression is Associated With Changes in Functional Transition Biomechanics and Neuromuscular Control During Sit-to-Stand in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Study Design Prospective cohort study. Objectives To compare sit-to-stand (STS) movement patterns and characterize neuromuscular activation and compensatory strategies in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) before and after lumbar decompression, relative to healthy controls. Methods Thirty-five DLS patients undergoing central decompression and sixteen healthy controls were included in the study. Patients were evaluated one week preoperatively and three months postoperatively; controls were tested once. STS kinematics and muscle activation were quantified using three-dimensional motion capture and surface EMG across three trials without upper-extremity assistance. Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression models adjusted for age and body mass index, with subject-level random intercepts. Results At peak trunk forward lean, postoperative patients shifted toward a lower-extremity–driven strategy, with greater knee flexion, reduced pelvic anterior tilt, and reduced thoracic flexion (25.9° vs 30.4°, p < 0.001). Neuromuscular coordination improved postoperatively. Normalized EMG findings reflect relative activation patterns and should not be interpreted as absolute muscle effort. Tibialis anterior activation occurred earlier (4.6% vs 10.1%, p = 0.002) with lower mean activity, suggesting improved anticipatory ankle control. Gluteus maximus showed earlier onset (2.9% vs 9.0%, p = 0.018), longer activation duration ( p = 0.001), and lower mean amplitude (0.9 vs 1.8, p = 0.002), reflecting more efficient hip extension. Erector spinae activation was delayed (9.3% vs 4.3%, p = 0.031) with reduced duration ( p = 0.003), indicating decreased reliance on protective trunk co-contraction. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly, including disability (ODI: 24.8 vs 44.4), fear of movement (TSK: 36.2 vs 43.4), physical function (PROMIS PF: 42.3 vs 35.1), and pain interference (PROMIS PI: 57.3 vs 66.2) (all p < 0.001). Conclusion Lumbar decompression was associated with measurable changes in functional transition biomechanics and neuromuscular coordination during sit-to-stand. Postoperatively, patients demonstrated reduced reliance on trunk-dominant compensatory strategies and protective extensor co-contraction, with greater lower-extremity contribution and improved anticipatory neuromuscular control. Importantly, these objective recovery signatures were detected despite minimal differences in task completion time, suggesting that conventional time-based assessments may underestimate meaningful postoperative functional recovery. Objective biomechanical assessment of activities of daily living may provide a sensitive measure of recovery following lumbar decompression and may help guide postoperative rehabilitation and functional optimization in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lumbar Decompression is Associated With Changes in Functional Transition Biomechanics and Neuromuscular Control During Sit-to-Stand in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
- Date Crossref
- 11/09/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Rochester Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Rochester Medical Center Department of Orthopaedics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University of Rochester Medicine et Department of Orthopaedics — University of Rochester Medical Center.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.