Management of Neuropathic Pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a complex and multifaceted condition in which pain may be neuropathic, nociplastic, nociceptive, or mixed in nature. This review aims to summarize the available pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for managing neuropathic pain in CRPS Types I and II. METHODS: Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports addressing the management of CRPS, with a focus on neuropathic pain. Studies were analyzed from the perspective of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, with attention to differences between CRPS Type I and II. RESULTS: Gabapentin (Level 1 evidence) and physiotherapy (Level 2 evidence) showed the strongest support among the treatments reviewed. Evidence remains limited or inconsistent for other pharmacological options (e.g., anticonvulsants other than gabapentin, opioids, antidepressants, ketamine, botulinum toxin) and for non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., mirror therapy, spinal cord stimulation, acupuncture). No significant differences in treatment efficacy were identified between CRPS Type I and II. CONCLUSION: Given the complex and heterogeneous nature of CRPS, a multimodal, individualized treatment approach is recommended. Further well-structured studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base for the management of neuropathic pain in CRPS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Management of Neuropathic Pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review
- Date Crossref
- 11/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.