Cytogenetic and Molecular Findings in Hydrops‐Related Mirror Syndrome
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Mirror syndrome is a rare, life-threatening condition in which maternal fluid overload mirrors fetal hydrops. Data on genetic findings in affected pregnancies are limited. We compared genetic diagnoses in hydrops cases with and without mirror syndrome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2012-2023) of pregnancies with non-immune hydrops at a single fetal center. Clinical data along with prenatal and postnatal genetic testing results were analyzed. Mirror syndrome was defined as fetal hydrops with new or worsening hypertension and significant maternal edema. Genetic testing rates and diagnostic yields were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of the 192 cases, 140 (73%) underwent genetic testing. Testing rates were similar between mirror (24/31, 77%) and non-mirror cases (116/161, 72%; p = 0.54). Abnormal findings explaining the phenotype were identified in 29% of mirror and 32% of non-mirror cases (p = 0.79). Rates of single-gene disorders, aneuploidy, and copy-number variants did not differ (p > 0.05). Most single-gene diagnoses involve cardiovascular or lymphatic pathways. CONCLUSION: The rates and types of genetic diagnoses were similar in hydrops cases with and without mirror syndrome. Despite limited power to detect subtle differences, these findings support a similar approach to genetic counseling and evaluation for hydrops cases with and without mirror syndrome.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Findings in Hydrops‐Related Mirror Syndrome
- Date Crossref
- 10/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.