Language Interpreter Use in Allied Health: A Survey of Provider Training and Opinions

Résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of formal interpreter training among allied health providers, describe their confidence and perceived challenges, and identify preferences for future support to improve care for patients with limited English proficiency. Method: A 26-question exploratory survey was distributed to all providers within audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy at a single pediatric hospital. The survey inquired about prior training, comfort working with interpreters, and barriers encountered. Results: Of 639 invited providers, 179 responded (28%). Most reported no formal interpreter training during graduate programs (83%, n = 150) or onboarding (72%, n = 128), yet expressed high confidence in working with interpreters ( M = 4.18/5, SD = 0.72). Providers rated in-person interpreter experiences more favorably ( M = 4.51/5, SD = 0.68) than virtual ( M = 3.11/5, SD = 0.87). Qualitative analysis revealed two primary themes: technology issues and preference for in-person interpreters. Conclusions: At a large urban, pediatric hospital, allied health providers lack formal interpreter training while reporting high confidence. This dissonance between confidence and preparation, coupled with persistent operational barriers, demands a shift from documenting problems to implementing solutions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.