Mix-Proportion Evaluation and Microstructural Characteristics of NaOH-Na2SO4 Composite-Activated Fly Ash-Based Grouting Materials
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
To improve fly ash utilization in mine grouting materials and address the slow reaction and limited early-age strength of fly ash-based binders, a fly ash-based grout was prepared using fly ash and S95-grade ground granulated blast-furnace slag at a mass ratio of 70:30 and activated with NaOH-Na2SO4. A full-factorial experiment evaluated the effects of water-to-solid ratio, total activator dosage, and NaOH:Na2SO4 on fluidity, bleeding rate, stone formation rate, and compressive strength at 7 and 28 d. Representative 7 d specimens were characterized by SEM, EDS, and XRD. Increasing the water-to-solid ratio improved fluidity but increased the bleeding rate and reduced the stone formation rate and compressive strength. The preferred mixture had a water-to-solid ratio of 0.55, a total activator dosage of 5%, and NaOH:Na2SO4 = 2:1. It exhibited a fluidity of 195.0 mm, a bleeding rate of 1.70%, a stone formation rate of 99.50%, and compressive strengths of 8.5 MPa at 7 d and 11.3 MPa at 28 d. At NaOH:Na2SO4 = 2:1, the specimen showed a denser microstructure with fewer pores and cracks, a local Ca/Si ratio of approximately 0.94, and more evident reaction-product features. The results provide an experimental basis for mix-proportion selection of fly ash-based grouting materials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mix-Proportion Evaluation and Microstructural Characteristics of NaOH-Na2SO4 Composite-Activated Fly Ash-Based Grouting Materials
- Date Crossref
- 10/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.