Effect of Remote Work on Intention to Stay in Thailand’s Tech Industry: A TOE Framework Perspective
Rattachement africain : th, tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study investigates the determinants of employees’ intention to stay in Thailand’s technology industry under remote work arrangements, using the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework as a contextual organising framework and drawing on social exchange and job demands–resources reasoning to explain employee-level attitudinal responses. Drawing on survey data from 650 professionals, the study tests a model linking technological, organisational, and environmental conditions to intention to stay through organisational commitment and job satisfaction. The results indicate that favourable technological characteristics, organisational support, communication processes, and government regulatory support strengthen organisational commitment, whereas technological complexity and home environment interference weaken it. Organisational commitment positively influences job satisfaction, which in turn enhances intention to stay. Additional robustness analyses comparing competing structural specifications indicate that the proposed indirect pathway is substantively stable, although a direct organisational commitment–intention-to-stay relationship cannot be ruled out. The study therefore positions TOE as a contextual taxonomy whose employee-level effects operate primarily through attitudinal mechanisms rather than claiming that TOE alone constitutes an individual-level behavioural theory.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of Remote Work on Intention to Stay in Thailand’s Tech Industry: A TOE Framework Perspective
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.