Tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in advanced fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial with metabolic biomarker analysis
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-RCC) is a rare, aggressive kidney cancer with no established standard of care. This phase 2 trial (NCT05877820) assessed first-line tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in advanced FH-RCC ( N = 20). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. After a median follow-up of 20.2 months, ORR was 95% (95% CI 75.1–99.9), and DCR was 100% (95% CI 83.2–100). Median PFS was 20.7 months (95% CI 17.8–NR), median DOR was 19.2 months (95% CI 16.3–NR) and 2-year OS rate was 89.7% (95% CI 77.2–100). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 45% of patients. Circulating succinyl-adenosine and succinic-cysteine tracked radiographic tumor burden in 80% of patients. Limitations include the single-center, single-arm design, and limited sample size. These results support tislelizumab plus lenvatinib as a potential first-line option for advanced FH-RCC, with favorable antitumor activity and manageable safety profile. Circulating succinate-modifying metabolites may complement response monitoring but require further validation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tislelizumab plus lenvatinib in advanced fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial with metabolic biomarker analysis
- Date Crossref
- 07/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.