Comparison of Reachable Workspace Capacity to Real-World Arm Use Performance: A Wearable Accelerometry Study on Chronic Stroke
Résumé fourni par la source
Reachable workspace (RWS) quantifies the three-dimensional space accessible to the upper limb, but its relationship with real-world arm use after stroke remains unclear. This study examined associations between camera-based RWS and smartwatch-derived movement behavior in 14 individuals with chronic stroke. Relative surface area (RSA) was measured at baseline, after which participants wore a smartwatch on the affected arm. Smartwatch data were summarized using Gross Movement and Activity Count (GMAC), representing the proportion of wear time spent in active arm movement within a functional workspace, and Active and Diverse Exploratory Movement (ADEM), representing the proportion of wear time that was active and diverse. Clinical outcomes included the Box and Block Test (BBT), Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UEFM), and Motor Activity Log (MAL). Total RSA and several workspace regions were reduced in the paretic compared with the nonparetic limb. Greater total RSA was significantly associated with ADEM (ρ = 0.66, p = 0.01), while its association with GMAC was numerically weaker and non-significant (ρ = 0.47, p = 0.09). RSA was also significantly associated with BBT, UEFM, and MAL, with correlations ranging from ρ = 0.57 to 0.76. These findings link camera-based RWS with wrist-worn measures of real-world arm performance after stroke.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Reachable Workspace Capacity to Real-World Arm Use Performance: A Wearable Accelerometry Study on Chronic Stroke
- Date Crossref
- 05/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.