Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

A Systematic Multi-Dataset, Multi-Seed Evaluation of Preprocessing Strategies for Retinal Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Accurate delineation of the optic disc and optic cup in retinal fundus photographs is a prerequisite for automated glaucoma screening. While encoder–decoder segmentation models have advanced considerably, the contribution of upstream preprocessing to segmentation accuracy, and the stability of that contribution across repeated training runs, remain insufficiently characterized. Methods: Five preprocessing pipelines, baseline, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Region of Interest (ROI) cropping, ROI+CLAHE, and CLAHE with heavy augmentation, were benchmarked under a fixed EfficientUNet++ model with an EfficientNet-B7 encoder on three publicly available fundus datasets (REFUGE, ORIGA, and Drishti-GS). Every configuration was retrained under three independent random seeds (42, 15, and 89) to assess run-to-run variability. Seed-level standard deviations accompany every reported mean and define the confidence limit on each ranking. Results: On REFUGE, CLAHE with augmentation (Config 5) achieved the strongest mean Dice (disc 0.9523±0.0017; cup 0.8348±0.0018). On ORIGA, all five configurations clustered within 0.0067 disc Dice; ROI+CLAHE (Config 4) was marginally ahead on disc (0.9681±0.0002) and augmentation led on the cup (0.8873±0.0024). On Drishti-GS, all five configurations converged successfully once optimizer and loss settings were corrected; the near-total failures seen in earlier single-run experiments reflected a configuration problem, not the small (81-image) training set. Conclusions: CLAHE applied to full-resolution images is the single most consistently beneficial preprocessing choice across all three datasets. ROI+CLAHE showed a small, initialization-stable advantage on ORIGA, but ROI crop centres were derived from ground-truth centroids, an oracle localization setting, and these results should not be interpreted as achievable by a fully automated pipeline. Data augmentation showed a consistent reduction in initialization sensitivity on small datasets and may be beneficial as a default strategy.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A Systematic Multi-Dataset, Multi-Seed Evaluation of Preprocessing Strategies for Retinal Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation
Date Crossref
07/09/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Retinal Imaging and AnalysisAI in cancer detectionRetinal Diseases and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Exploration à la demande auprès d’OpenAlex, avec contrôle bibliographique public par Crossref. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.