Contemporary Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Outcomes: A Multicentre National Cohort Study
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study determined contemporary transplant-free survival in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), identified baseline factors associated with death or transplant, and assessed performance of the ILD-GAP (Gender, Age, Physiology) index in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), or unclassifiable ILD (uILD) prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included. Transplant-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was estimated overall and by subtype using enrollment as time zero. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations between patient characteristics and time to death or transplant. ILD-GAP scores were calculated at 1, 2, and 3 years, and discriminability was assessed with Harrell's C statistic. RESULTS: Among 4236 patients with fibrotic ILD enrolled in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF), 31% had IPF, 40% CTD-ILD, 9% fHP, and 20% uILD. Overall transplant-free survival was 91% at 1 year, 72% at 3 years, and 57% at 5 years. Survival was lowest in IPF (87%, 61%, 39%) and highest in CTD-ILD (95%, 81%, 70%). Compared with IPF, CTD-ILD was associated with better 5-year survival after adjustment (hazard ratio 0.64 [0.55-0.76]). ILD-GAP showed moderate discrimination at 1 (C = 0.75), 2 (C = 0.74), and 3 years (C = 0.73). CONCLUSION: In this registry cohort anchored at enrollment, CTD-ILD had superior transplant-free survival versus IPF, and ILD-GAP provided moderate prognostic accuracy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Contemporary Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Outcomes: A Multicentre National Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 07/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.