Modeling mobile payment adoption toward a cashless society using integrated TAM TRA and TPB with SEM and ANN
Résumé fourni par la source
The study investigates mobile payment system (MPS) adoption in Bangladesh by identifying the factors that shape users’ attitudes and behavioral intentions. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) are integrated to evaluate the user behavior. A quantitative survey of 411 MPS users, conducted via purposive sampling, was administered online. Data analysis followed a two-stage strategy including Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with artificial neural networks (ANNs). PLS-SEM was used for theory-driven linear modeling and hypothesis testing in SmartPLS 4.0, supported by descriptive and preliminary analyses in SPSS 27.0, while ANNs were applied to explore potential non-linear patterns and compare predictive accuracy. Main results show that attitude (AT), performance expectancy, and perceived ease of use significantly drive behavioral intention (BI) to use MPS. However, ANN analysis reveals interesting findings in the nonlinear model evaluation, where AT is the dominant predictor, and PBC is the second most significant predictor of BI. This study advances theory by integrating TAM, TRA, and TPB in the context of MPS user behavior in an emerging economy. The findings highlight the importance of user-centered interface design, usability, and manageable personalized services for fostering continuous MPS adoption.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Modeling mobile payment adoption toward a cashless society using integrated TAM TRA and TPB with SEM and ANN
- Date Crossref
- 06/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.