Clinical determination of forefoot morphotypes in flexible Charcot-Marie-Tooth cavovarus feet - A novel system of clinical examination
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Cavovarus foot morphology varies significantly, necessitating bespoke treatment. Four distinct forefoot morphotypes have been described which may aid surgical planning. This study assesses whether clinical examination can accurately assess forefoot morphotype. METHODS: Retrospective, single-centre study including 60 CMT cavovarus feet. Feet were categorised clinically into four previously described morphotypes by two clinicians. Clinical findings were compared to software-based categorisation of weightbearing CT images (30 feet). RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was 0.943 for clinical versus software; 0.938 between clinicians. 60% were Type 1, 21.7% Type 2, 10% Type 3 and 8.3% Type 0. Three distinct subtypes of Type 3 were noted: Balanced (pure adduction), Plantarflexed (additional plantarflexion of first ray) and Pronated (additional pronation of whole forefoot). Eleven Type 1/2 feet had an Adduction subtype. CONCLUSION: Cavovarus foot morphology can be reliably identified on clinical examination. This may aid decision making for surgeons without access to weightbearing CT or specialised software.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical determination of forefoot morphotypes in flexible Charcot-Marie-Tooth cavovarus feet - A novel system of clinical examination
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.