Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 dataset

Dataset: Repurposing Chlorhexidine as a Potential Anti-Virulence Agent in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [Molecular Docking Raw Data and Analysis]

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Raw computational outputs and analysis supporting the molecular docking results reported in "Repurposing Chlorhexidine as a Potential Anti-Virulence Agent in P. aeruginosa: A Molecular Docking Study Targeting Quorum Sensing Regulators and Biofilm-Associated Proteins" (under revision, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, manuscript A-10-2719-2).Chlorhexidine, levofloxacin, and ceftriaxone were docked against six P. aeruginosa proteins (LasI, LasR, PslG, PelA, PelB, RhlR; PDB IDs 1RO5, 2UV0, 5BXA, 5TCB, 5WFT, 8DQ0) using fpocket 4.0 for binding-pocket detection and smina (AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 base) for docking, at the manuscript's stated parameters (exhaustiveness = 8, 5 poses per ligand-target pair). Ligands were built in 3D with RDKit from the SMILES given in the manuscript. Docking sites for LasR and RhlR were independently verified against reported/published key binding-site residues before docking (see Pocket_Verification sheet), including a correction to the RhlR site after the originally reported residues were found to belong to a co-crystallized partner protein (PqsE) rather than RhlR itself.This dataset includes: per-pose binding affinities for all 18 ligand-target combinations; a 3-random-seed robustness check for the two corrected targets; residue-level contact analysis (4.0 Å cutoff) for every complex; a full methodology README; and a number-by-number comparison against the manuscript's reported values, with methodological deviations and caveats documented explicitly. Provided in response to peer-review request for underlying data supporting transparency and independent verification of the reported docking results.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.