Potential aerosol tradeoffs of vessel speed reduction for fresh ship plume composition and tracer coverage
Résumé fourni par la source
Vessel Speed Reduction (VSR) lowers ship CO 2 emissions, but its aerosol consequences remain poorly constrained. Combining unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) plume interception, single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS), and population-balance inversion across 14 ship plumes, we reconstructed ultrafine and coarse modes and identified two marker gaps. Only 35.8% of the reconstructed particle-number population carried detectable V (29.5% at 4.9 versus 39.7% at 13.4 knots in a matched-vessel pair; 0–70.8% across a speed-blind manifold), showing operation-dependent marker coverage. Approximately 20% of analyzed particles met SPMS biomass-burning criteria, indicating potential false positives in ship-influenced samples. Plume-stratified analysis found 2.3–10.7-fold higher median sulfate-related ion signals in V/VO-bearing particles. Independent V–S co-location supports an association potentially arising from V-associated sulfur chemistry during exhaust cooling, pre-existing SO 3 uptake, or terminal co-deposition; laser desorption/ionization matrix effects may contribute to the contrast. In the matched-vessel case, VSR’s CO 2 benefit coincided with a carbon-rich particle shift, altered V/VO–sulfur signatures, and lower strict detectable-V coverage. This indicates a potential aerosol-composition and marker-reliability trade-off missed by bulk-mass metrics, with implications for hazard-relevant compositional indicators.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Potential aerosol tradeoffs of vessel speed reduction for fresh ship plume composition and tracer coverage
- Date Crossref
- 05/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.