A decade apart: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy unmasked in a young woman with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome—A multimodality imaging case report
Résumé fourni par la source
Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome is a rare congenital disorder of pituitary development, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is an inherited myocardial disease and a recognized cause of sudden death in the young. To our knowledge, their co-occurrence has not been previously reported. We report the case of a 32-year-old woman with a decade-long history of hormonally complete PSIS, who presented with progressive exertional fatigue and 2 exertional syncopal episodes. Electrocardiography showed anterior T-wave inversions, echocardiography demonstrated right ventricular dilatation with regional hypokinesia, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed severe right ventricular dysfunction with fibro-fatty replacement, fulfilling 2 major 2010 Task Force criteria for definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. She was managed with a beta-blocker, activity restriction, a primary-prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and continued hormone replacement, with a stable outcome at 6 months. This case highlights the complementary role of multimodality imaging in establishing the diagnosis, and raises the possibility of a shared developmental origin between the 2 conditions, supporting consideration of cardiac evaluation and genetic characterization in similar patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A decade apart: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy unmasked in a young woman with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome—A multimodality imaging case report
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.