The MexMAGIC population reveals the genetic architecture of traits exhibiting clinal variation in Mexican native maize
Résumé fourni par la source
Defining the genetic basis of local adaptation is a key goal of evolutionary biology and crop improvement. Theory predicts that when selective pressures follow differences in the environment, a cline will be established. Clines can be exploited to uncover adaptive variation by association of alleles with the environment. However, monotonic phenotypic change over a cline is not necessarily mirrored in the behavior of genetic variants and population structure can further complicate analysis. To study genetic and phenotypic variation across the environment, we developed a multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population using eight Mexican native maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) varieties sourced from distinct agroecological zones. We evaluated the population in a common garden in Mexico and mapped tassel branching and flowering time, two traits that exhibit clinal variation. Variation in tassel branching was dominated by a single QTL with allele effects aligning to a negative elevational cline. By contrast, allele effects associated with 11 identified flowering time QTL were not consistently correlated with any one source environmental factor. Our observations support the prediction that genotype-environment association will be strongest under simple genetic architecture, although, even then, analysis in native populations may be confounded by population structure.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- The <scp>MexMAGIC</scp> population reveals the genetic architecture of traits exhibiting clinal variation in Mexican native maize
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.