Restoration of circulating 2-arachidonoylglycerol levels attenuates cocaine self-administration through endocannabinoid–dopamine interactions in common marmosets

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract To date, no pharmacotherapy has been approved for cocaine use disorder. Endocannabinoid signaling is closely related to dopamine-dependent reinforcement and may regulate cocaine-related behaviors. In this study, we used common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ) to investigate whether 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), an endogenous cannabinoid lipid, reduces cocaine reinforcement in a non-restraint oral self-administration model. Marmosets performed oral cocaine self-administration under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule, and cocaine intake was confirmed using plasma benzoylecgonine detection. Dopamine transporter (DAT)-related positron emission tomography (PET) signal, DAT and G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55)- associated fluorescent signals, GPR55/DAT immunofluorescence, and synaptosomal dopamine responses were assessed using 18F-N-(3-fluoropropyl)-2β-carboxymethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane ( 18 F-FP-CIT) PET imaging, ex vivo fluorescent ligand imaging, confocal microscopy, and dopamine quantification. Marmosets acquired oral cocaine self-administration with preferential active lever responding. Repeated cocaine self-administration reduced striatal DAT-related 18 F-FP-CIT PET signal in vivo. In striatal slices, cocaine decreased fluorescent false neurotransmitter (FFN102)-associated DAT signal and increased T1117-associated GPR55 signal. Systemic 2-AG pretreatment reduced cocaine self-administration while restoring diminished circulating 2-AG levels. GPR55 and DAT immunofluorescent signals were colocalized in marmoset brain sections, and 2-AG enhanced cocaine-induced dopamine elevation in synaptosomal preparations. Taken together, these findings suggest that 2-AG attenuates cocaine-taking behavior and may be associated with GPR55/DAT-related dopaminergic responses in common marmosets.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.