Replication of sex differences in tobacco smoking-induced dopamine responses and extension to nicotine replacement therapy

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco smoking is a major public health risk, and treatment efficacy differs by sex. Previous imaging studies reported sex differences in smoking-induced striatal dopamine release, but no PET study has independently replicated these findings. We applied a novel, more sensitive modeling pipeline to examine sex differences in dopamine responses to smoking and modulation by nicotine replacement therapy in archival PET data. METHODS: Thirty-one smokers (13 women) underwent 90-min PET scans with [11C]raclopride. Participants smoked a cigarette mid-scan (35 min) after tracer injection both following one week of placebo patch and one week of nicotine patch in a crossover design. Voxel-wise striatal time-activity curves were analyzed using our pipeline that combined the linear parametric neurotransmitter PET (lp-ntPET) model with Bayesian parameter estimation. Endpoints included spatial extent of dopamine activation and a dopamine activation metric that integrates probability of activation and peak dopamine magnitude at every voxel. RESULTS: Under placebo, men showed greater dopamine activation in the ventral striatum (p=0.047), consistent with reward-driven smoking. Women exhibited higher spatial extent in the right dorsal caudate (p=0.028) and whole caudate (q=0.033), consistent with habit- and stress-related mechanisms. The dopamine activation difference between placebo and nicotine patch conditions was larger in men than women across the whole striatum (p=0.011), indicating sex-specific modulation by constant nicotine administration. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support previously observed sex differences in striatal smoking-induced dopamine responses. Sex-specific effects of the nicotine patch may be relevant to widespread findings in the literature reporting lower efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy efficacy in women.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.