A Novel Metric to Guide Cancer Priorities in Pakistan
Résumé fourni par la source
Pakistan faces an escalating cancer burden, with approximately 185,748 new cases and 118,631 deaths annually. According to GLOBOCAN data, breast cancer (16.5%), lip/oral cavity cancer (8.6%), and lung cancer (5.1%) are the most prevalent, with breast cancer alone accounting for 31.3% of female cases. The country's limited healthcare resources, including severe shortages of oncologists and radiotherapy facilities, exacerbate this crisis, requiring urgent intervention. The delta Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio (dMIR) metric identifies cancers with the largest outcome gaps between Pakistan and top-performing countries, highlighting where improvements could yield the greatest impact. For instance, stomach cancer (dMIR = 0.60), Kaposi sarcoma (0.58), and oral cavity cancer (0.49) represent critical priorities. By focusing resources on high-dMIR cancers through early detection, treatment access, and prevention programs, Pakistan can significantly reduce preventable mortality. To address these challenges, Pakistan must implement a comprehensive National Cancer Control Plan. Key steps include expanding screening programs for breast, cervical, and oral cancers; training healthcare workers; upgrading radiotherapy infrastructure; and launching public awareness campaigns targeting tobacco use and lifestyle risks. Strategic investments in these areas, coupled with policy reforms and public-private partnerships, could transform cancer outcomes in Pakistan. Key Words: Pakistan, Cancer burden, Delta mortality-to-incidence ratio, Cancer disparities, Low- and middle-income countries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Novel Metric to Guide Cancer Priorities in Pakistan
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.