First-line therapy and maintenance outcomes in Chinese patients with marginal zone lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis with prognostic implications for chemotherapy decision-making
Résumé fourni par la source
This multicenter retrospective study evaluated first-line treatment patterns, maintenance therapy outcomes, and prognostic factors in 171 newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients treated across multiple centers in Fujian Province, China (2019-2024). The MALT subtype predominated (79.0%), with the gastrointestinal tract and lung being the most common primary sites. The first-line overall response rate was 91.1%, with 67.3% of patients achieving complete remission. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.6% and 94.7%, respectively. Maintenance therapy, received by 66.1% of patients, was associated with superior 5-year OS (100% vs. 87.5%, P=0.0104). Multivariate analysis identified Ki-67 >20% (HR=3.208, P=0.024) and high tumor burden (HR=4.670, P=0.003) as independent negative predictors for PFS, while high tumor burden (HR=4.493, P=0.004) and B symptoms (HR=3.324, P=0.030) predicted worse OS. Chinese MZL patients demonstrated favorable outcomes, and maintenance therapy conferred a significant OS benefit. Ki-67, tumor burden, and B symptoms serve as practical prognostic indicators to inform risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- First-line therapy and maintenance outcomes in Chinese patients with marginal zone lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis with prognostic implications for chemotherapy decision-making
- Date Crossref
- 05/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.