Malevolent Conspiracy Theories and Cartesian Doubt

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Belief in malevolent global conspiracies is often treated as a defeater for philosophical seriousness. Engaging with Lee Basham’s defense of conspiracy theorizing and Genia Schönbaumsfeld’s critique, I make two claims. First, we must distinguish the ambitious multi-institutional schemes of non-total malevolent global conspiracies, which nevertheless remain evidentially vulnerable, from conspiracy theories that are self-sealing. Only the latter are epistemically vacuous. Second, properly understood, Cartesian doubt is a norm-governed temporary device for re-ordering reasons, a standing commitment to the view that everything can be doubted. The assumed kinship between radical skepticism and self-sealing conspiracy theories, therefore, overstates their structural similarity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.