Causal relationship between trace elements and pityriasis rosea
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pityriasis rosea (PR) represents a frequently occurring, acute, self-limiting papulosquamous disorder with complicated and undetermined pathogenesis, and there are no definite tissue markers or drug targets. Thus, the clinical treatment of this disease is challenging. Recent studies have partly unraveled correlations of trace elements with the onset and development of skin diseases. This study utilized the Mendelian randomization (MR) strategy to excavate the causality between trace elements and PR. A forward and multivariate MR analysis was implemented on trace elements and PR to infer the causal relationship between them, with inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the dominant analytical method, supplemented by other methods (heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and leave-one-out sensitivity tests) to ensure data stability. The results of MR analysis, mainly based on the IVW method, suggested a causation between vitamin A and PR and indicated vitamin A as a protective factor against PR (IVW: P = .023; odds ratio [OR] = 0.677; OR < 1; 95% confidence interval: 0.245-0.897). The multivariate MR analysis suggested that vitamin A could independently act on PR (P = .018; OR = 0.426; 95% confidence interval: 0.001-35.620). Vitamin A is causally associated with PR and serves as a protective factor against the disease, providing valuable insights for subsequent clinical diagnosis, treatment, and scientific research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Causal relationship between trace elements and pityriasis rosea
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.