Deaths Mentioning Both Pancreatic Cancer and Renal Failure in the United States, 1999–2024: Temporal Trends and Disparities
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: We examined temporal trends in deaths mentioning both pancreatic cancer and renal failure in the United States. Methods: We analyzed CDC WONDER multiple-cause-of-death data for adults aged ≥25 years from 1999 to 2024. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were assessed using Joinpoint regression. Secondary analyses quantified renal-failure co-recording among pancreatic-cancer-involving deaths, renal-failure subtypes, disparities, and comparisons with lung and bronchus, colorectal, and liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancers. Results: Overall, 31,497 deaths mentioned both conditions. The AAMR increased from 0.37 per 100,000 in 1999 to 0.82 in 2024, with the most rapid increase during 2018–2024 (annual percentage change, 10.77%; 95% CI, 7.18–18.22%). Renal failure was co-recorded in 2.98% of pancreatic-cancer-involving deaths. Corresponding proportions were 2.37% for lung and bronchus, 4.75% for colorectal, and 5.77% for liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer; recent trends did not differ significantly from pancreatic cancer. Acute kidney failure was the most frequently recorded renal subtype (43.22%). In 2024, AAMRs were higher among males and highest among non-Hispanic Black individuals. Conclusions: Renal-failure co-recording with pancreatic cancer increased markedly after 2018 but was not unique to pancreatic cancer. Death-certificate data do not establish temporal sequence or causality; linked clinical data are needed to clarify potentially modifiable kidney-related pathways.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Deaths Mentioning Both Pancreatic Cancer and Renal Failure in the United States, 1999–2024: Temporal Trends and Disparities
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.