Development of a Droplet‐Based RNA Interference Feeding Assay for Neonates of the Citrus Root Weevil Diaprepes abbreviatus

Le résumé fourni par la source

The citrus root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus, is an economically important pest of citrus and ornamental crops whose subterranean larval feeding damages roots and predisposes plants to secondary pathogen infection. Development of efficient RNA interference (RNAi) delivery methods for early larval stages is essential for functional genomics studies and the evaluation of RNAi-based pest management strategies. In this study, we developed a droplet-based feeding assay for oral delivery of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to neonates of D. abbreviatus using chitin synthase 2 (DaCHS2) as a model RNAi target to validate the assay. Feeding solutions containing dsRNA were supplemented with sucrose and bromophenol blue dye, with bromophenol blue used to visually confirm ingestion. Across three independent biological replicates, all neonates exposed to DaCHS2-dsRNA, GFP-dsRNA, and water control droplets were confirmed to have ingested the feeding solution (45/45 neonates per treatment; 100% feeding success). Oral delivery of dsRNA targeting DaCHS2 reduced transcript abundance and was associated with developmental abnormalities and mortality, including incomplete molting, abnormal pigmentation, cuticular deformities, defective pupation, and malformed adults. Regression analysis demonstrated moderate and significant relationship between dsRNA concentration and neonate mortality and developmental abnormalities. RT-qPCR further confirmed reduced DaCHS2 transcript abundance following oral dsRNA exposure. The developed assay provides a simple, reproducible, and minimally invasive proof-of-concept platform for oral dsRNA delivery to D. abbreviatus neonates. The assay requires only small dsRNA volumes, provides visual confirmation of ingestion, and may facilitate laboratory-based screening of additional RNAi target genes in D. abbreviatus and other coleopteran pests.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.