Development and Field Evaluation of a Sustainable Polymer–Mineral Modified Bitumen Binder for Asphalt Pavements
Résumé fourni par la source
The development of more sustainable asphalt materials requires modified bitumen binders that combine thermal resistance, adhesion, and deformation capacity. In this study, soft paving-grade bitumen was modified with styrene–butadiene–styrene polymer, oil refinery sludge, titanium slag, and lead-furnace cyclone dust. Binders with bitumen-to-modifying-system ratios from 90:10 to 60:40 were characterized by FTIR, TGA/DSC, XRD, and portable XRF analyses and evaluated using penetration-type consistency, softening-point, qualitative adhesion, and tensile deformation tests. The modifying-system content produced non-monotonic changes in binder properties. Among the investigated formulations, the 75:25 composition provided the most balanced response, with a penetration depth of 8.6 mm, a softening point of 65.0 °C, a maximum elongation of 355.66 mm, and high qualitative film retention on mineral aggregate. In contrast, the 60:40 binder showed increased penetration and the lowest elongation, indicating that excessive modifier loading was unfavorable. The 75:25 binder was subsequently used in small-scale asphalt concrete sections and showed acceptable preliminary behavior during mixture preparation, placement, and compaction. The results demonstrate composition-dependent relationships in the investigated multicomponent system and support further evaluation of selected industrial by-products in modified bitumen binders.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development and Field Evaluation of a Sustainable Polymer–Mineral Modified Bitumen Binder for Asphalt Pavements
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.