Forecast-informed 100-m wind modelling for renewable-grid integration and curtailment readiness in the Brazilian Northeast power system
Résumé fourni par la source
This study asks whether quality-controlled 10 m station meteorology can support transparent short-term forecasting of a constructed 100 m wind-speed proxy in a data-limited region. Twelve INMET stations in Pernambuco are analysed with chronological splitting, a 24-record input window, recurrent neural networks, repeated particle-swarm hyperparameter search, Gaussian-mixture regimes, spatial diagnostics and turbine-equivalent conversion. The implemented task predicts the next available chronological record; it is not a 24-hour-ahead forecast. In the evaluation set, 91.5% of target transitions are one hour, but only 35.3% retain a completely contiguous 24-hour input window. Across all next-record targets, the GRU obtained RMSE = 1.339 m s −1 , MAE = 0.979 m s −1 and R 2 = 0.678 ; on the strictly contiguous subset ( n = 398 ), GRU RMSE was 1.301 m s −1 . Station-specific shear calibration reduced the external-reference bias from −2.32 m s −1 to −0.67 m s −1 , but external R 2 remained negative ( − 1.411 ), so the constructed target is not a substitute for LiDAR, mast or SCADA hub-height measurements. A source audit further showed that all 14,112 energy-system-aligned records were generated by the documented fallback proxy because no ONS series was successfully ingested. Accordingly, the paper reports meteorological and turbine-equivalent screening only and makes no claim of measured curtailment, reserve savings, unit-commitment cost reduction or operational deployment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Forecast-informed 100-m wind modelling for renewable-grid integration and curtailment readiness in the Brazilian Northeast power system
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2027
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.