Correction: Herbal medicine as a complementary therapy for dysmenorrhea: effects on pain and reduction of analgesic use

Résumé fourni par la source

The Author Contributions Statement has been corrected to read: [insert correct author contributions statement] The original version of this article has been updated.The order of authors in the author list of the published paper was erroneously given as: [insert incorrect author list] The correct author list reads: [insert correct author list] The original version of this article has been updated.Adding Consortia Author [insert incorrect author] was erroneously assigned as equal contributing author. The original version of this article has been updated.Author [insert missing author] was erroneously omitted as equal contributing author. The original version of this article has been updated.The copyright for this article was incorrectly written as [insert incorrect copyright statement]. The correct statement is "Copyright ©[Insert year] Insert corresponding statement for institution. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.". The original version of this article has been updated.Adding/removing text In the abstract, [state the error that was made]. This has been corrected to read: [insert correct sentence/abstract] The original version of this article has been updated. Wrong content While reviewing the published tables, I found that the nine adjustment-variable rows (Age, Marital status, Smoking, Full-term birth, Preterm birth, Primary/Secondary dysmenorrhea classification, outcomes at baseline had been transcribed from the wrong regression output when the tables were assembled, so the values shown did not correspond to each table's own model. I have corrected all three tables so that every row -adjustment variables and key exposure variables alike -comes from the single, correct regression underlying that table.(1) There was a mistake in figure / The original version of this article has been updated.(3) There was a mistake in

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.