Single-pulse reanalysis of the 2024 Vela glitch and new observations of PSR~J0437$-$4715 and PSR~J1644$-$4559

Le résumé fourni par la source

The Pulsar Monitoring in Argentina (PuMA) collaboration systematically monitors southern glitching pulsars, maintaining high-cadence single-pulse records of the Vela pulsar. We present a pulse-per-pulse reanalysis of the 2024 major glitch of Vela (PSR~J0835$-$4510) with the 400~MHz-bandwidth ROACH backend of the Argentine Institute of Radioastronomy, and extend our machine-learning single-pulse pipeline---Isolation Forest outlier rejection, $β$-Variational-AutoEncoder denoising, and Self-Organizing-Map clustering---to new observations of PSR~J1644$-$4559 and the millisecond pulsar PSR~J0437$-$4715. For Vela, the 4- and 6-cluster decompositions of the eight days bracketing the glitch reproduce, with seven times the previous bandwidth, the behavior found with the narrow-band ETTUS receivers: higher-amplitude clusters peak earlier in phase, are narrower, more skewed, and less populated. With the glitch jump and its two exponential recovery terms included in the timing solution, the mean profile is stable to 1\% across all eight days (width change $-0.5\pm0.9$\% from pre- to post-glitch); omitting the recovery terms would mimic a post-glitch broadening of up to 55\% through a folding-frequency error at the $10^{-7}$ level. The clusters of PSR~J1644$-$4559 differ almost exclusively in amplitude, as expected for a scattering-dominated profile. For PSR~J0437$-$4715, retaining the 10\% of pulses with the highest peak-dominance score doubles the signal-to-noise ratio, and a five-cluster decomposition yields narrow, phase-ordered groups a factor $3.6\pm0.4$ narrower than the average profile, suggesting a $\sim$3.5-fold improvement in cluster-based timing precision for this pulsar-timing-array target, to be confirmed in a follow-up paper.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.