Two-Stage Maximum Power Point Tracking Photovoltaic Converter for IoT Sensor Nodes with Hardware Validation
Résumé fourni par la source
Continuous operation is increasingly expected of Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless sensor network (WSN) nodes, yet practical solar front ends must account for source variability, intermediate storage, conversion losses, sensing overhead, and battery-management constraints. This article develops and evaluates a discrete, two-stage photovoltaic front end for such nodes: a perturb-and-observe (P&O) buck stage tracks the maximum power point of a 20 W Solarland SLP020-12U module (rated 17.2 V, 1.16 A) and feeds an intermediate storage bus, while a PI-compensated SEPIC stage regulates the IoT rail to 3.2 V independently of that bus voltage. Closed-loop MATLAB/Simulink simulations are reported at 1000, 800, and 600 W/m2. The reported conversion figures originate from an idealized switching model and should therefore be interpreted as simulation-only values rather than measured prototype efficiency. A low-cost Arduino-based prototype confirms correct switching behavior and a 20.0048 kHz PWM signal, but the available captures lack synchronized, calibrated input/output power logging; consequently, no hardware efficiency, MPPT tracking efficiency, regulation error, ripple, or settling-time figure is claimed. The revised manuscript makes this simulation-to-hardware boundary explicit, adds the power cost of sensing and data conversion to the loss discussion, strengthens the battery-management and deployment caveats, and defines the measurements required for full quantitative validation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Two-Stage Maximum Power Point Tracking Photovoltaic Converter for IoT Sensor Nodes with Hardware Validation
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.