Biologic Therapies for Severe Pediatric Asthma: Current Evidence, Clinical Indications, and Future Directions

Résumé fourni par la source

Severe pediatric asthma remains a significant clinical challenge despite advances in conventional therapy. Some children continue to experience persistent symptoms, recurrent exacerbations, and substantial morbidity despite optimized treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators. Advances in the understanding of asthma immunopathology, particularly type 2 (T2) inflammation, have led to the development of targeted biologics that modulate key inflammatory pathways. Several monoclonal antibodies are now approved for pediatric use, including the anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) agent omalizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)-5 therapies such as mepolizumab, and the IL-4 receptor antagonist dupilumab. These biologics significantly reduce exacerbation rates, improve lung function, and decrease dependence on systemic corticosteroids in selected pediatric populations. Their effective use, however, requires careful assessment of clinical phenotypes and biomarkers, including blood eosinophils, serum IgE, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Uncertainties remain regarding treatment sequencing, duration, long-term safety, and cost-effectiveness. Agents targeting upstream epithelial cytokines, including tezepelumab, are broadening the therapeutic landscape. Despite this progress, pediatric evidence remains fragmented across age groups, biologic agents, study designs, and real-world cohorts, while many reviews focus on individual therapies or partly extrapolate from adult data. This review synthesizes pediatric evidence on efficacy, safety, biomarker-guided selection, age-related indications, and implementation challenges across approved and emerging biologics. It aims to provide clinicians with a practical framework for treatment selection and monitoring while identifying priorities for future pediatric research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.