Author Correction: Multi-driver biodiversity impact assessment reveals hidden hotspots in institutional consumption

Résumé fourni par la source

In the version of this article initially published, there were errors in the “Product comparison” section, where in the first paragraph, in the text now reading “The top fifteen commodities,” fifteen originally read “ten”; in the third paragraph, where “volume‑driven products (Q4), and lower‑priority items (Q3)” originally read “volume‑driven products (Q3), and lower‑priority items (Q4)”; where “Q4 comprises high‑volume commodities…where total impacts are driven primarily by quantity rather than per‑unit intensity (17%)” originally read “Q3 comprises high‑volume commodities…where total impacts are driven primarily by quantity rather than per‑unit intensity (33%)”; where “Q3 contains products of relatively low priority” originally read “Q4 contains products of relatively low priority”; and where “Q3 is best maintained” originally read “Q4 is best maintained.” In Supplementary Table 4, a citation to Fig. 1 now replaces Fig. 3, and Q3/Q4 in the quadrant description has been amended in line with the manuscript. The text and Supplementary Information are now amended in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.